Experiments dating back to 1920 showed over and over that if we tend to had an acid-forming diet rich in meat that we would get a big spike in the amount of calcium being lost in our urine. We have known since 1912 that meat was acid-forming within the body.
Meat and eggs have a lot of sulfur-containing amino acids
Meat and eggs have 2 to 5 times more sulpher containing amino acids than grains and beans that are metabolized into sulphuric acid, which the body buffers with calcium compounds. And where is calcium stored in the body? The skeleton. So the thinking was that every time we ate a steak, our body would pull calcium from our bones, bit by bit, and over time this could lead to osteoporosis. Based on 26 such studies, for every 40 grams of protein, we add to our daily diet, we pee out an extra 50 mg of calcium. We solely have concerning 2 pounds of calcium in our skeleton, so the loss of 50 grams daily would mean losing close to 2% of our bone calcium every year. By the end of the 20th century, there was little doubt that acid-forming diets would dissolve our bones away.
But if we actually look at the studies done on protein intake and bone health, that’s not what we find. So, where’s the flaw in the logic? Meat leads to acid, which leads to calcium loss, which leads to bone loss, right?
Well, it’s uncontroversial that protein results in greater calcium excretion, however, we’ve simply been assumptive it’s coming back from the bone—where else may the additional calcium dumped in our urine be coming from but our bones?
This is the study that appeared to solve the mystery. An intrepid group of researchers tried feeding a group of volunteers radioactive calcium and then put them on a high protein diet. What happens when you put people on a high protein diet? The amount of calcium in their urine shoots up, and indeed that’s just what happened. But here’s the large question, was that extra calcium in their urine radioactive or not? To everyone’s surprise, it was radioactive. This meant that the excess calcium in their urine was coming from their diet, not from their bones.
What looked as if it would be happening is that the excess protein consumption boosted calcium absorption, from down around 19% up to 26%. All of a sudden there was all this extra calcium in the blood, so presumably, the kidneys are like “whoa, what are we going to do with it all?” So they dump it into the urine. 90% of the additional calcium in the urine after eating a steak doesn’t appear to be coming from our bones however from our diet. We’re not sure why protein boosts calcium absorption. Maybe protein increases the solubility of calcium by stimulating stomach acid production? Whatever the reason, there was indeed additional calcium lost, but also more calcium gained such that in the end, most of that extra calcium is accounted for. In effect, more calcium is lost in the urine stream, but it may be compensated by less loss of calcium through the fecal stream.
This was repeated with even more extreme diets—an acid-forming five-burgers-a-day-worth-of-animal protein diet that limited fruits and vegetables versus an alkaline diet emphasizing fruits and vegetables. More calcium in the urine on burgers, but significantly greater calcium absorption, such that at the end it was pretty much a wash.
Other studies have also since supported this interpretation. Here’s an ingenious one: Feed people a high animal protein diet however add in an alkali salt to neutralize the acid. The recent thinking would predict that there would be no calcium loss since there’s no excess acid to buffer, but no, even though the acid load was neutralized, there was still the excess urinary calcium, consistent with the radioactive isotope study, challenging the “long-standing dogma that animal protein consumption results in a mild acidosis promoting the increased excretion of calcium.”
So if our body isn’t buffering the acid formed from our diet with our bones, how is it neutralizing the acid? Maybe with our muscles. Alkaline diets may protect our muscle mass! I cover that in my video Testing Your Diet with Pee and Purple Cabbage.
Now the boost in calcium absorption will solely compensate if you’re taking enough in. For example, the dietary acid load may be associated with lower bone mineral density in those getting under 800mg a day. Plant Protein is Preferable to animal protein for a variety of reasons (tends to have less methionine, is less IGF-1 promoting, etc.), but it’s not clear how much of an advantage it’s once it involves bone health.
I previously touched on this topic in my video Is Protein Bad to the Bone? But I promised I’d take a deeper dive, hence the above video. If there are other topics you’d like me to cover in greater depth please note them below in the comment section.